Scrum vs. Kanban

As a project manager, it is important to know the differences between Scrum and Kanban for effectively managing projects and teams. Both are popular frameworks in the realm of Agile project management, but they have distinct characteristics and methodologies. Let’s delve into the key differences:

  1. Methodology:
    • Scrum: Scrum is an iterative and incremental Agile framework that emphasizes structured roles, ceremonies, and artifacts. It divides work into time-boxed iterations called sprints, typically lasting two to four weeks. Scrum teams plan their work in a backlog, prioritize tasks, and commit to delivering a potentially shippable product increment at the end of each sprint. Scrum relies on fixed roles such as Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Development Team.
    • Kanban: Kanban, on the other hand, is a visual management method used to optimize workflow efficiency. It emphasizes continuous delivery and encourages teams to limit work in progress (WIP) to avoid bottlenecks. Kanban boards visualize the flow of work items through different stages of a process, typically represented as columns on a board. Unlike Scrum, Kanban doesn’t prescribe specific roles or ceremonies. Instead, it allows teams to adapt their process as needed and focuses on evolutionary change.
  2. Scheduling and Iteration:
    • Scrum: Scrum uses fixed-length iterations (sprints) where the team commits to delivering a set of features or user stories by the end of each sprint. The duration of sprints remains consistent throughout the project, fostering predictability and cadence.
    • Kanban: Kanban doesn’t have fixed iterations. Work is pulled through the system based on capacity and demand rather than being scheduled in predefined time blocks. Teams focus on optimizing flow and can continuously deliver value without the constraints of fixed iterations.
  3. Roles and Responsibilities:
    • Scrum: Scrum defines specific roles, including the Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Development Team. The Product Owner prioritizes the backlog, the Scrum Master facilitates the Scrum process, and the Development Team is responsible for delivering the work.
    • Kanban: Kanban doesn’t have predefined roles. Team members are generally responsible for managing their own work and collaborating to optimize the flow of tasks through the system. There might be leadership or specialist roles within the team, but they’re not mandated by the framework.
  4. Change Management:
    • Scrum: Scrum encourages stability during sprints, with minimal changes to the scope of work once a sprint has started. Changes are typically addressed in the next sprint planning session.
    • Kanban: Kanban allows for more flexibility and continuous improvement. Changes can be made at any time, and the focus is on responding quickly to new requirements or insights without waiting for a new iteration to begin.

In summary, while both Scrum and Kanban are Agile methodologies aimed at improving productivity and adaptability, they differ in their approach to planning, scheduling, roles, and change management. The choice between Scrum and Kanban often depends on the specific needs and preferences of the team and the nature of the project. Some teams may even choose to blend elements of both frameworks to create a hybrid approach that best suits their unique circumstances.

Morgan

Project Manager, Business Analyst, Artist, and Creator.

Leave a Reply